Designing for Participation: Engaging the silent masses in communities

Most communities, whether digital or in real life, are shaped by a familiar pattern: a small, active group takes the lead, while the majority remain silent followers or observers. Leadership often defaults to this vocal few, and while they are essential, the health and resilience of a community depend on broader participation. These social dynamics we observe within communities are not an isolated phenomenon. They reflect broader patterns in our society. Most people don’t naturally step into a role of active contribution. 

Thriving communities exist in spite of this dynamic. But when only a small group holds all the influence, fairness is often undermined and democracy is weakened. Decisions reflect the interests of the few, not the many. Marginalized groups remain unheard and under-served even though diverse perspectives often drive better solutions. Also wicked problems like climate change, housing, or public health require broad participation to solve. 

There are likely many reasons why most people hold back from active participation. This dynamic may stem from the way our societies are structured, or it could be rooted in human nature itself. Taking part often requires vulnerability, which can feel threatening and may conflict with our instinct for self-preservation. It’s clear that both sociological and psychological factors contribute to this behavior.

Even though this dynamic is common, community leaders must respond to it intentionally. That means designing and facilitating communities in a way that actively encourages and enables participation from as many members as possible. Designing for participation means shifting from assuming engagement to actively creating the conditions for it.

In this article, we'll explore seven practical tactics for expanding engagement beyond the usual voice, creating conditions where more members feel empowered to contribute. 

1. Activate the power of small groups

Encouraging and supporting small groups directly addresses the reasons people hold back from participation, by reducing risk, increasing connection, fostering autonomy, and empowering individuals in tangible ways. Small groups aren't just a tactic. They are a structural and psychological intervention that helps unlock wider, more equitable participation.

Small, engaged groups can serve as testing grounds for ideas, incubators for leadership, and social hubs that help others feel connected. Long-term nurturing of these groups helps build leadership skills organically. Community ambassadors often emerge from these spaces and become key drivers of engagement. Community ambassadors are individuals who actively represent, promote, and nurture a community. This can be either internally (within an organization) or externally (among customers, partners, or stakeholders). They serve as connectors and informal leaders and invite members to engage and share knowledge.

Smaller groups or clusters, whether by interest, geography, or purpose, enhance member involvement. They create a sense of intimacy that helps members feel visible and valued. Encouraging these self-organizing niches fosters agency and shared ownership. When people feel ownership, and have autonomy, they tend to feel more committed.

Action steps:

• Create small-group formats for events (breakouts, circles, pods).

• Limit group sizes to 5–8 people to ensure everyone can easily participate.

• Train moderators to encourage equal voice and gently invite quieter participants.

• Provide light structure (guiding questions, time limits) to reduce pressure.

2. Facilitate, don’t dictate

Facilitation is about reflecting, not dictating, the community’s desires. It means guiding energy, not controlling it. This is especially important to prevent dominance by the loudest voices. Members frequently default to following strong or established voices, which can discourage others from speaking up.

Good facilitation involves creating space, encouraging quieter members, and modelling good listening. For example, think of techniques like “rounds” or “go-arounds” to ensure everyone gets a turn. This allows for a more distributed sense of leadership where more members feel empowered to contribute. Not all members feel confident in their own knowledge. But by sharing what they do know, whatever the field, they begin to see the value it brings to the group. This builds a sense of self-worth that grows stronger as more personal knowledge is shared, both in and for the community. So, help members see their knowledge as valuable, even if it feels “small.”

Action Steps:

• Frame contributions as co-created wisdom, not personal expertise.

• Ask members to share experiences, not opinions (“When have you faced this?” vs “What do you think?”).

• Create recurring formats that showcase different kinds of knowledge (“tips from the field,” “things I’ve tried,” “unexpected wins”).

• Acknowledge not just what’s shared, but the act of sharing.

3. Create psychological safety

Psychological safety is essential for authentic engagement. If members fear embarrassment, judgment, or being ignored, they will withdraw. Usually this fear is already there before members become part of a community. Introverts, in particular, benefit from encouragement.

It can therefore be incredibly helpful, especially in smaller groups, to have personal conversations from the very beginning about what psychological safety means to each person, and what is needed for everyone to truly experience it. Community managers must intentionally design not only for trust and vulnerability but also for leaving previous bad experiences of judgment and embarrassment behind. 

To build trust, community leaders can share personal stories and imperfections, which invites others to do the same. They should also share a clear vision on moderation and the community’s culture. As you can see, a community leader must be quite versatile in order to help groups develop a stronger sense of community.

Action Steps:

• Open early conversations about what psychological safety means for different members.

• Co-create group norms: Ask the group what behaviors feel respectful or harmful to them.

• Normalize check-ins and emotional reflection (“How are you arriving today?”).

• Use active listening in facilitation, reflect back, don’t rush to respond or solve.

4. Provide clarity and structure

People often assume that communities grow organically and don’t need structure. There's a common fear that structure will disrupt the natural flow and make participation feel forced. But in reality, no group effort can truly happen without someone, or a small team, providing some level of structure.

Take a simple group activity, for example: someone has to decide where you're going, who’s coming, what time it happens, and who’s getting the tickets. In short, participation becomes much easier when people know exactly what they’re saying yes to.

Clearly defined roles and expectations encourage participation. People want to know what’s expected of them and how they can contribute meaningfully. Vague invitations like "jump in whenever you have a question" rarely work. Instead, give specific asks:

• “Would you like to help moderate this topic or group?”

• “Can someone share an example from their own situation?”

• “We're looking for a co-host for next week’s session, interested?”

Providing clear processes and protocols gives a better idea on how the community ‘works’ and boosts member confidence. It helps people navigate the community space and signals that their time and input will be valued based on the goals of the community. Think also of developing a community ‘menu’ with a large variety of smaller and bigger tasks that members can choose from. It creates a sense of autonomy that supports intrinsic drives.

Action Steps:

• Regularly communicate that structure exists to support participation, not limit it.

• Create and share simple overviews of how the community works (“How to get started” guides or FAQs).

• Assign light coordination roles (greeters, organisers, moderators, facilitators) to members, rotating when possible.

• Use consistent formats and rhythms (weekly themes, monthly meetups) to build trust through predictability.

• Design a visible “menu” of ways to get involved, grouped by time/effort (5-min, 30-min, 1-hour roles). Align this with community goals so members know how their efforts contribute to the bigger picture.

• Provide a simple orientation guide or onboarding flow for new members.

• Hold “Ask Me Anything” sessions to make community processes transparent.

5. Use technology thoughtfully

It’s often a struggle to connect technology with real life human engagement. Features alone don’t foster community. Many platforms lack the social frameworks needed to guide participation. Without those frameworks, rituals, roles, onboarding, and feedback loops, most members float aimlessly or retreat. Balance is key: community structure should support organic enthusiasm while setting clear boundaries.

Imagine, for example, a new online platform for climate activists. It has all the right features: forums, event calendars, private messaging, and even a points system for contributions. But after launch, engagement is low. People join, poke around, and leave. There could be several reasons for this. There’s no onboarding to help them understand how to contribute. There are no community rituals, no weekly check-ins, challenges, or shared wins to create rhythm. There are no visible roles or pathways to leadership. And there's no social feedback loop, no one welcoming new members or responding to their first posts.

Even though the tech is solid, people don’t feel connected, seen, or guided. As a result, enthusiasm fizzles. With the right social framework, the same platform could thrive. The technology enables this, but the community structure activates it.

Action steps:

• Include a clear onboarding flow (guided tour, “start here” checklist).

• Use a visual map or dashboard that explains where to find key spaces (discussions, resources, events).

• Use templates or structured input fields for common post types (“Ask a question,” “Share a win,” “Event recap”).

• Add micro-roles or contributor badges people can opt into (“conversation starter,” “welcomer”).

• Pin posts in each section so new users know what “good participation” looks like.

• Use threaded replies or comment sections to allow for ongoing, layered conversations.

• Allow users to save or “follow up later” on threads they’re interested in.

• Offer quiet ways to participate: reactions, polls, bookmarks, or “I’m interested” buttons.

• Notify users when someone replies, quotes, or thanks them.

• Display top contributors or recent helpers in a non-competitive way (“Community Shout-Outs”).

• Include “off-topic” or “lounge” spaces where members can connect more personally.

• Let members personalize profiles or bios to show who they are beyond their role.

6. Recognize and celebrate contribution

Science proves that people contribute more when they feel seen and appreciated. A simple public thank-you, featuring a helpful post, or highlighting a comment in a newsletter can go a long way. Highlighting positive member behaviour also fosters a culture of contribution. It signals what’s valued and sets a tone others can follow.

Over time, this builds a culture where participation is more normal, as part of the community’s culture. Also with this approach it’s key to have a larger variety of members contribute in various ways so that members are inspired to participate in a way that appeals to them personally.

Action steps:

• Ask members to reflect on how they like to contribute and share that with others (“I contribute by…” prompts).

• Ask members what kinds of recognition they find meaningful.

• Invite members to nominate others for recognition or contribute to a community highlights board.

• Create moments for peer-to-peer shout-outs (at the end of events, in threads, or via a “Thank You Thursday” post).

• Highlight diverse forms of contribution, not just big or visible efforts, but small, consistent ones too.

• Quote or re-share thoughtful or supportive comments to show that engagement matters at every level.

• Avoid always spotlighting the same people. Rotate who’s featured and actively search and invite new voices. 

7. Reflect on Bias and Power

Self-awareness of bias not only strengthens credibility in leadership but helps ensure more inclusive participation. Community managers must therefore regularly self-reflect to minimize their own assumptions. Addressing ego and fear is essential. Both can distort discussions and push people to disengage.

Community professionals must be willing to challenge their own ego and create spaces where others can do the same. This is where real dialogue begins. In a world where there are not a lot of examples of this kind of facilitating leadership, community managers can set an example.

Action steps:

• Ask a trusted peer or mentor for feedback on your facilitation patterns or blind spots.

• Notice where you feel the need to be “right,” “in control,” or “liked."

• Shift from “having the answer” to asking the better question.

• In difficult conversations, pause and name your discomfort (“I’m noticing this is uncomfortable for me”).

• Share a moment when you misjudged, misunderstood, or learned from someone in the community.

• When called out or questioned, thank the person and show how you’ll adjust.

• Regularly remind members that everyone (including you) is learning in public.

• Establish community values like “assume best intent, but own your impact” or “we learn by listening, not just speaking.”

• Host occasional workshops or reflections on bias, empathy, or courageous dialogue.

• Invite other members to co-lead, especially those who bring different lived experiences.

These seven tactics offer practical tools to help as many people as possible get involved. Designing for participation is about crafting a container where people feel safe, seen, and supported to act. It’s not a push, it’s an invitation. When done well, it moves communities from a dynamic of "few speaking for many" to one where many voices shape the whole.

This brings us back to the key question: do people refrain from participating simply because they aren't adequately invited and supported or because they don't want to, can't, or are afraid to? 

We may never fully know the answer, but as community managers, we have an important responsibility. With time, attention, empathy, and recognition, we will build more than just engaged groups. By holding space in this way we might be influencing how society learns to collaborate, trust, and co-create. And in a time of polarization, isolation, and algorithmic noise, this work has never been more vital.

----------------

Authored by Kirsten Wagenaar

In collaboration with Kristen Pavle, Todd Nilson, Catherine Hackney, and Serena Snoad